Automotive · Thermomechanics

Solar load: simulating the deformation of interior plastic parts

Behind glazing, a trim can exceed 100°C in full sun. A two-step thermomechanical simulation methodology reproduces the OEM solar test, from meshing to post-processing, and was transferred to the client's teams.

105 °Cin exposed areas
2computation steps
20 000mechanical elements
100 %methodology transferred
Instrument panel hit by the sun through the windshield, thermal field

The challenge

Behind glazing in full sun, interior plastic parts (instrument panels, trims, window scrapers) locally exceed 100°C and deform. Full-vehicle solar tests come late in the project and are costly. The need: a simulation methodology that faithfully reproduces the OEM test and that in-house analysis teams can run autonomously, from the CAD stage.

Step 1: thermal analysis

The temperature map is obtained through one of two routes, depending on available data: the radiative method, where the test's radiant panels are modeled as infrared sources in a cavity (70°C ambient), or the imposed temperature-band method when measurements exist. The thermal mesh is a quad shell mesh built on the parts' neutral fiber, of about 5,000 elements.

Computed temperature field on an automotive door trim under solar load
Computed temperature field on a door trim under solar load (up to 105°C, modernized rendering of the computation)

Step 2: thermomechanical analysis

The temperature field is transferred by submodeling to the finer mechanical mesh (about 20,000 elements), then a nonlinear computation evaluates stress and deformation. The part's real attachments (clips, screws, staples, rivets) are modeled as multi-point rigid elements validated with the design teams, and part-to-part contacts are accounted for. Initial temperature: 23°C.

Computed displacements on an automotive quarter trim under thermal load
Displacements under thermal load computed on a quarter trim (magnitude, mm)
Comparison of three mounting configurations along the windshield line
Three mounting configurations compared along the windshield line

Results

  • Thermal maps consistent with the reference solar test, up to 105°C in exposed areas
  • Displacements, reaction forces, stress and deformation available for every configuration, before any physical test
  • Design choices settled on curves: instrument panel position and clip clearances compared along the windshield line
  • Mesh quality criteria differentiated between thermal and mechanical steps, for a robust pipeline
  • Step-by-step documented procedure, from meshing to post-processing, transferred to the client's in-house teams
Politique de confidentialité Politique relative aux Cookies